|
|
Post by Spangle on Nov 4, 2007 0:13:03 GMT
1)a small fraction of their population hold a majority of the votes eh? then there's something wrong with the democracy over there  2)they can't even use it for research into human exploration of mars... 3)it said no to the kyoto treaty then went out and made it's own, maybe it's just that the government of america think they own the world? 4)it can't be a very strong freedom of information act if 40 year old documents are only just being released... 5)NASA's been very backwards with the shuttle... they got rid of some safety systems that would have saved the challenger crew because the weight would lower their profits... meh, the gun laws are still psycho any idiot can get a gun (if you deny it look at verginia tech or the NASA labs shooting) and america believing they control the world is pretty bad too, look at the nuclear non-profileration treaty, it basically says "no one can have nuclear weapons, except america" they made north korea sign it recently and give up it's nuke... and the nuclear sheild in europe to protect america, typical "i'm alright jack, pull the ladder up" |
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Azzoria on Nov 4, 2007 2:04:56 GMT
1. Kansas is a small fraction of the population. I don't think you understand.
2. I just looked it up. The Democrats did that, d**n them. They are still allowed to do anything including unmanned missions and the designing of a colony is still allowed, just not the operation of a manned mission itself.
3. King of sounds like the League of Nations. America just would rather call the shots on how something is done rather than agree with a precedent set by someone else.
4. Hardly 40. More like 20. And the freedom of information act applies to things from the modern day, the old documents are only classified military ones that if released would provide all-to-recent tactical information to our enemies. You need to draw the line somewhere.
5. Lowering their profits doesn't make sense.
Nothing could have saved them once the outer casing was ruptured, the reaction was too rapid.
6. I agree.
7. Well America has treaties with many countries that do not want or need to develop nuclear weapons that promises retaliation on their enemies if they are nuked. The system has become too regulated to let just anybody have nuclear weapons.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spangle on Nov 4, 2007 3:05:03 GMT
1)whatever the other arguments are more fun than this one... 2)designing a colony but not being able to build one would be worse than nothing at all though 3)Yes, america would rather call the shots, because they can't stand some other country setting something they have to follow... 4)You said some of the cold war documents are only just being released, cold war, 40 years ago... 5)There was enough time for challenger, if they had the safety systems the shuttle was originally designed with they could have lived, they scrapped those safety systems so the cargo bay could be bigger and hence they could get more money, they put money over life too much in america for my tastes... 6)Yay! 7)America just expects everyone should get rid of their nukes, russia, korea, china, india, iran... but america never really plans to get rid of their own... instead they build more... |
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Azzoria on Nov 4, 2007 15:29:58 GMT
1)whatever the other arguments are more fun than this one... 2)designing a colony but not being able to build one would be worse than nothing at all though 3)Yes, america would rather call the shots, because they can't stand some other country setting something they have to follow... 4)You said some of the cold war documents are only just being released, cold war, 40 years ago... 5)There was enough time for challenger, if they had the safety systems the shuttle was originally designed with they could have lived, they scrapped those safety systems so the cargo bay could be bigger and hence they could get more money, they put money over life too much in america for my tastes... 6)Yay! 7)America just expects everyone should get rid of their nukes, russia, korea, china, india, iran... but america never really plans to get rid of their own... instead they build more...
1. Hah.
2. No; designing a colony allows all the necessary technology to be ready when the time comes that they may undergo the mission.
3. Exactly.
4. The Cold War ended 17 years ago.
5. They also could have coated the inner side of the spacecraft with industrial sized pillows and laminated them. They just weren't practical for the budget and time limit.
6. ;D
7. No we don't. |
|
|
|
Post by Spangle on Nov 4, 2007 15:55:39 GMT
1) meh 2) but they can't use the funding to design the colony so there'ld have to be some guy in the corner using donations to design it 3)that's pretty big-headed of america though isn't it? 4)*checks* so it did... but it wasn't very cold warry then 5)but the safety systems were originally designed into it... then removed in construction 6)another argument in agreement 7)but then why have they made the nuclear non profileration treaty and expect the other nations to sign it and get rid of their nukes? and why did this topic go from blessing jamzinia to america fights again? |
|
|
|
Post by Kieran on Nov 4, 2007 16:35:26 GMT
This topic really made me laugh, I personally really like the Americans and I despise all who say otherwise, What's your view on George Bush Brandon?
|
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Azzoria on Nov 4, 2007 17:31:30 GMT
1) meh 2) but they can't use the funding to design the colony so there'ld have to be some guy in the corner using donations to design it 3)that's pretty big-headed of america though isn't it? 4)*checks* so it did... but it wasn't very cold warry then 5)but the safety systems were originally designed into it... then removed in construction 6)another argument in agreement 7)but then why have they made the nuclear non profileration treaty and expect the other nations to sign it and get rid of their nukes? and why did this topic go from blessing jamzinia to america fights again?
1. </won>
2. Have you never heard of purposely mislabeling funding?
New Toilets: $23,000,000,000.00 
3. Quite.
4. </won>
5. I still don't think they would have made a difference. When the spacecraft began reentry it was doomed.
6. </won>
7. Because we prefer Your Assured Destruction to Mutually Assured Destruction.
8. You started it.
9. Bush isn't as bad as people make him out to be. He's more of a victim of circumstance. |
|
|
|
Post by Spangle on Nov 4, 2007 17:42:00 GMT
1) </lost> 2)Pentagon should have done that, rather than putting "Aurora" on their bill... 3)</won> 4)</lost> 5)Wrong shuttle mate, that's columbia, I'm talking about Challenger, exploded on takeoff 6)</won> 7)Which is bigheaded, see 3 8)No you started it (yay for childish argument) 9)He seems unbelievably stupid, remember when he asked the blind man why he was wearing sunglasses on a cloudy day? |
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Azzoria on Nov 4, 2007 17:50:09 GMT
1) </lost> 2)Pentagon should have done that, rather than putting "Aurora" on their bill... 3)</won> 4)</lost> 5)Wrong shuttle mate, that's columbia, I'm talking about Challenger, exploded on takeoff 6)</won> 7)Which is bigheaded, see 3 8)No you started it (yay for childish argument) 9)He seems unbelievably stupid, remember when he asked the blind man why he was wearing sunglasses on a cloudy day?
1. </won>
2. Well who exactly forbade them from spending money on Aurora? Nobody.
3. No you didn't, we're in agreement
4. </won>
5. Bah. Well I agree with you then. We weren't arguing about the same thing.
6. </won>
7. See 3.
8. I'm too good to be drawn into childish argument!
9. Because he didn't know that he was blind. Everyone slips up. |
|
|
|
Post by Spangle on Nov 4, 2007 17:56:36 GMT
1)</lost> 2)but when it's a secret project you don't exactally put it on the bill 3)I won because we're in agreement that america is bigheaded </won> 4)</lost> 5)</won> 6)I won because it's a problem with ameria</won> 7)We're in agreement that ameria is bigheaded meaning </won> 8)no your not! 9)www.gwjokes.com if a website is dedicated to you being stupid i think it's pretty provable that you're stupid |
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Azzoria on Nov 4, 2007 18:11:42 GMT
1. </won>
2. Nobody without sufficient research would know what Aurora is just from the name. Also, there was a military channel TV show on it so it wasn't exactly secret.
</won>
3. </mutual won>
4. </won>
5. </mutual won>
6. </won>
7. </mutual won>
8. </won>
9. So what? There are also websites that say that there are alien invaders preparing on the moon.
</won>
All done. 
|
|
|
|
Post by Spangle on Nov 4, 2007 18:16:18 GMT
1)you win 2)still going 3)i won 4)you won 5)i won 6)i won 7)i won 8)still going 9)still going www.youfail.org |
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Azzoria on Nov 4, 2007 18:17:41 GMT
You didn't win any of those and you know it.
Also, saying that it's still going but saying nothing else about it counts as a fail.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spangle on Nov 4, 2007 19:18:57 GMT
I clearly won them shall we get back on topic now? GOD BLESS JAMZINIA VIVA |
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Azzoria on Nov 4, 2007 21:38:11 GMT
Viva, quite.
When does James get on?
|
|
Jamzinian Lion Order
