|
|
Post by Lord Keith on Jan 31, 2008 20:16:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by King James I on Jan 31, 2008 20:21:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Keith on Jan 31, 2008 20:25:28 GMT
Do you think we can hit 4000 over the next month?
|
|
|
|
Post by King James I on Jan 31, 2008 20:26:10 GMT
Nope, I think we can hit 5,000!  |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Keith on Jan 31, 2008 20:27:19 GMT
only if we get 10 citizens posting realistically
|
|
|
|
Post by King James I on Jan 31, 2008 20:34:59 GMT
Aye, I was kidding, but still it's something to aim for. If we had 5 people, each posting 30 times a day, we'd be going over 4,000 a month. Though for the moment, a good target for next month would be 2,000.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Keith on Jan 31, 2008 20:36:04 GMT
I've got an idea for a thread. Check the secret project boards and I'll explain
|
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Azzoria on Jan 31, 2008 21:06:59 GMT
The idea had better not have the count to a million thread. That needs to end.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Keith on Jan 31, 2008 21:08:56 GMT
Why its just fun!
|
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Azzoria on Jan 31, 2008 21:12:24 GMT
Then the money for posts should be eliminated entirely. You should receive absolutely nothing for a number.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Keith on Jan 31, 2008 21:17:14 GMT
Its just to raise post counts. Lets face it, if activity is dead like las month at least it adds a few posts to the boards
|
|
|
|
Post by Spangle on Jan 31, 2008 22:50:38 GMT
No.
Just no.
If we do then I vote we change the name of Jamzinia to Lovely.2
|
|
|
|
Post by King James I on Jan 31, 2008 22:52:08 GMT
Is it the general opinion that the Million posts thread is bad for our identity, in that it makes us look desperate for posts and a little devious?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spangle on Jan 31, 2008 22:57:45 GMT
Yeah, it looks so desperate and needy.
|
|
|
|
Post by King James I on Jan 31, 2008 23:02:42 GMT
In hinsight maybe it wasn't such a good thread, although it would generate activity it reminds me of Beagium.
|
|
Jamzinian Lion Order
